Another theory we learned about was Constructivism, which is a theory of learning based on the idea that knowledge is constructed based on mental activity. As learners, we are an active agent in seeking meaning. As learners, we can reflect upon our own experiences and can construct meaning and understanding of the world in which we live. My concern about this theory is that some individuals are incapable or not equipped with the knowledge needed to construct an accurate understanding of the world in which we live in. I like the idea that the "learners" are able to adjust their mental perspectives in order to understand and accommodate any new experiences. This theory reminds me of Louis Rosenblatt's theory on "Reader Response." Rosenblatt's believed that the reader was capable of constructing their own unique and subjective meaning behind a text. In a sense these learning theories are an attempt of removing the restrictions of thought. When we allow students to become "active" agents in their learning, we empower them to become more then a body in a classroom. My only concern is: Educators already have their backs up against the wall when it comes to the "race for the top." How on earth are they going to incorporate these learning styles into a classroom forced to achieve proficiency? I am all for application of knowledge of experience, but is it really achievable?
My technology professor Mr. Holman wrote a blog talking about "Learning vs. Teaching: Is there a difference we should think about?" This article pretty much sums up programming. Programming in the sense that as students we require a syllabus before we begin the start of the class, but this article address the fact of "how do I teach students if I don't know what they know?" Mr. Holman has a point. How is he to make up a syllabus if he doesn't know what we know? This appears too logical, but in high schools across the country, teachers are preparing syllabus based upon what COLLEGE has TOLD them to do. Learning should be fun and it should be interactive and I agree that the best learning occurs when it's spontaneous. I'm currently teaching a reading workshop and I have decided to give a general overview of the lesson plans. I did not stick to the required lessons plans dictated by college, but instead decided that I'm going to allow my students to show me what they know, what they need to know and to actively transform this experience for themselves. I understand flexibility and diversity and in a sense these students feel more relaxed and more comfortable in expressing themselves. Students should have say on how they learn. I am there only as a knowledge broker to ensure these students are making a wise investment in themselves.
ck_sk_learningstrat.m4a |